Transique’s structuring practice designs transactions that are tax-efficient, FEMA-compliant, stamp-duty-rational, SEBI-appropriate (where listed-entity parties are involved) and commercially grounded.
We structure M&A, fundraising, joint-venture, carve-out, demerger and promoter-restructuring situations for Indian and cross-border contexts. Structuring decisions made at the term-sheet stage cost significantly less than those forced at the definitive documents stage — and much less than those renegotiated post-closing.
The answer depends on desired corporate and business structure and also the tax implications, stamp-duty implications and regulatory constraints. Buyers often prefer asset deals for cleaner liability profile; sellers often prefer share deals for simpler tax and stamp-duty. We analyse the specific situation and recommend with written reasoning.
It could be, but not where time is essence. Schemes offer certain tax advantages (capital-gains exemption under specified conditions) but carry NCLT process time. Slump sales close faster but attract capital-gains tax on the seller. The structure that fits best depends on timing, parties and tax posture.
Within the framework of the FEMA (NDI) Rules — automatic route vs government route, sectoral caps, pricing guidelines, reporting (FC-GPR / FC-TRS). We design the entry structure, prepare filings and coordinate with the AD bank.
Yes. ODI (Overseas Direct Investment) routing under FEMA, coordination with target-jurisdiction counsel on local acquisition law, tax, transfer-pricing, and structuring for repatriation.

